Posted by : Shawn in (Emerging Church)

What is the Emerging Church?

I’ve been a bad blogger.  I haven’t had a “real” entry in too long.  Chalk it up to a busy schedule at work, along with a number of new projects I’m working on (one project landed me an interview with Veronica Belmont of Mahalo Daily on Monday!), and some real life crap that has just sucked my spirit dry.

So until I make the time to bring you my own stuff, I’m going to keep linking to other people’s stuff.  Here’s a post that is a year or so old that I just stumbled on.  It does a really good job of introducing someone to “Emerging Church.”

What is the Emerging Church?

Posted by : Shawn in (Church, Emerging Church)

We Are Not the Church of Tomorrow

Carol Howard Merritt wrote a post about focus groups and organizations that seek to get the input of young adults.  Her main point is that organizations don’t need focus groups if they want to serve young adults, what they need is young adults in positions of power.  Here is some of what Carol wrote,

[Our generation does]…”everything differently. We are wired differently. We communicate differently. We raise money differently. We protest differently. We do missions differently. While you were excited about German modernists in seminary, we were excited about French deconstructionists…

…My generation is different. If we’re not included on your board or organization, we don’t care. We’ll just walk off and start our own thing. If you really want to work with a new generation, you need to get over yourselves. Quickly. You don’t have much time. You’re not the country club that we’re dying to get into. If you’re waiting for a person to turn fifty before you begin listening to what they have to say, or before you consider them to be an expert, it will be far too late. You can’t wait for the younger generations to kick down the door to break into the leadership of your organization. We won’t do it. We don’t need to. We’ll simply walk away. If you’re interested in sustaining through a new generation, please understand, as much as I believe that my generation needs the denominational church, my peers don’t. But one thing is clear: you need us.”

In the last couple of months I was visiting with a staff member at my alma mater, Union-PSCE, who was trying to tel me all the wonderful things happening at the seminary.  A bright and rosy picture was being painted for the seminary’s future and eventually we came to talk about the age of the trustees on the board at Union-PSCE.  When I asked how many younger people were on the board I was met by blank look that didn’t seem to understand why anyone would ask that question.

As Carol wrote above, it is a dangerous thing to leave young people out of power in an organization, because they will leave and do their own thing.  This is why mainline protestant churches are dying and emerging churches are growing.  Emerging churches typically enact the belief that “every member is a minister” through dialogical sermons, worship teams,  and flat leadership.  While mainline churches have Youth Advisory Delegates, token youth elders, and create special groups for young adults so that the main structures of the church (i.e. worship) don’t have to change.

This is how the next quasi-7% Event is going to happen.  This was an event created, promoted and funded by the PC(USA) for clergy under 40.  But for some reason, the denomination let it quietly fade away.  Well, there’s a group of us who aren’t content for it to go gently into the good night, and we are planning on partnering with Montreat Conference Center  to host this event during the week of June 7-13, 2009.

“If we’re not included on your board or organization, we don’t care. We’ll just walk off and start our own thing.”

Posted by : Shawn in (Emerging Church)

Help! I’m trapped in a nutshell!

In a recent group email conversation among friends someone asked how to sum up emerging church in 50 words or less. Being a minister I wrote 850 words.  What do you think?

The emerging church movement is definitely not monolithic, and for the most part this is intentional. It is often referred to as a conversation or a friendship rather than any sort of structure or institution. Not to say that establishment and institution doesn’t creep in, because it does. Emergent Village is an organization (some say brand) that is kind of the central hub of U.S. emerging stuff. There’s emerging stuff happening worldwide though, especially in the U.K. and there have been several conferences and get-togethers between emerging Christian folk and Emerging Judaism folk.

If you want some academic jargon and ten cent words that begin to get at emerging church here is the beginning of the Wikipedia entry:

“The emerging church (also known as the emerging church movement) is a 21st-century Protestant Christian movement whose participants seek to engage postmodern people, especially the unchurched and post-churched. To accomplish this, “emerging Christians” (also known as “emergents”) deconstruct and reconstruct Christian beliefs, standards, and methods. This accommodation is found largely in this movement’s embrace of postmodernism’s postfoundational epistemology, and pluralistic approach to religion and spirituality. Proponents of this movement call it a “conversation” to emphasize its developing and decentralized nature as well as its emphasis on interfaith dialog rather than verbal evangelism. The predominantly young participants in this movement prefer narrative presentations drawn from their own experiences and biblical narratives over propositional, biblicist exposition. Emergents echo the postmodern rejection of absolutes and metanarratives. They emphasize the subjective over the objective since postmodern epistemology is ultimately destructive of certainty in objective propositions.”

I don’t think a lot of people come to emerging stuff through all that deconstruction mumbo-jumbo though. I think a more common path is taken when people examine their own life and the life of the Christians around them and see that they really aren’t that different than anyone else’s. Then they look at the typical church and see a mostly well-meaning institution that does more to support the status-quo of “good living” rather than a life like Jesus that was radically for others, risky and often in confrontation with the values of the world.

I just picked up Rob Bell’s book “Velvet Elvis” this morning and he writes this in his intro:

“I’m part of this global, historic stream of people who believe that God has not left us alone but has been involved in human history from the beginning. People who believe that in Jesus, God came among us in a unique and powerful way, showing us a new kind of life. Giving each of us a new vision for our life together, for the world we live in.

And as a part of this tradition, I embrace the need to keep reforming.

By this I do not mean cosmetic, superficial changes like better lights and music, sharper graphics, and new methods with easy-to-follow steps. I mean theology: the beliefs about God, Jesus, the Bible, salvation, the future. We must keep reforming the way the Christian faith is defined, lived, and explained.

Jesus is more compelling than ever. More inviting, more true, more mysterious than ever. The problem isn’t Jesus; the problem is what comes with Jesus. For many people the word Christian conjures up all sorts of images that have nothing to do with who Jesus is and how he taught us to live. This must change.”

Here is a quote from the U.K. stream.

What is it that emerging church is doing differently?
To serve a diverse mission context, fresh expressions of church are correspondingly varied. A significant difference in one stream of emerging church is the targeting of a network rather than a neighbourhood for mission; some people (network churches) identify more with where they work and socialise than where they sleep. Another stream is defined by its use of small-group as the context for church (base communities, cell church). Other streams have kept congregation size but have changed where it gathers, when it gathers and what takes place (alternative worship, café church, midweek church, youth congregations). Further still, some emerging churches are embarking on community development where any expression of their worshipping life is low-key and still evolving. Some churches will draw on more than one of these differences as appropriate.”

In regards to your question about canon. There’s really no emerging doctrine that is set in writing, but in general the Bible contains truth from God but a more narrative truth. The punch line of one story often repeated in emerging church circles has a 17 year old saying, “I don’t know whether or not the virgin birth actually happened, but it is so beautiful that it has to be true.” But I would say for the most part in emerging churches the Bible is not simply on-par with everything else, it’s not just another form of art and expression that has truth, but neither is it the traditional textbook from God that others make it out to be, or just a historical document to be dissected and studied.

Posted by : Shawn in (Emerging Church, PC (USA))

Is the PC(USA) worth “saving?”

If you aren’t a reader of pomomusings, you should be. Adam Walker Cleaveland is a seminarian/soon-to-be minister who offers wonderful thoughts, insights, and questions about faith, the PC(USA), web design and his dog. He posted an entry today entitled Can presbymergent Save the PC(USA)?. After reading it, I immediately agreed and disagreed with him and started telling him so in his blog comments. After four paragraphs, I figured I should just blog my response instead. So here it is.

Adam,

I’m a little troubled by a couple of your statements. I think I get the main thrust of your post - presbymergent is about being faithful, not about reforming or renewing the PC(USA). It’s not a 5 step method of increasing church attendance, getting young people in the door, or re-energizing a dying denomination. I agree wholeheartedly with that. What bothers me a little bit is your statement where you seem to say you aren’t concerned about the dying PC(USA).

I agree that as Christian saving the PC(USA) is not *the* goal, but I think it’s OK to be concerned for the denomination’s health. Personally, even with all our faults, I believe that the PC(USA) has unique gifts to be used in responding to God’s call and being part of God’s Kingdom. And so I am concerned about the dying PC(USA), because I believe that God is working with through the PC(USA) for good.

Our top priority should definitely be following Jesus and being the body of Christ in the world. It should not be being Presbyterian, but for me following Jesus leads me to be concerned about the dying PC(USA). If presbymergent or pomomusings were dying (and I thank God that they are thriving and growing), I would be concerned about them. Not because God can’t get by without them, but because they are an important part of many people’s journey of faith, and they are contributing to God’s Kingdom. I believe that this is also the case for the PC(USA).

You may not be doing this, but many people almost have this fatalism about the PC(USA). They take the attitude that if it dies it must be God’s will. This may be the case, but it may not be. Many wonderful ministries die because people screw them up, not necessarily because God wills it. If our denomination fades away I want to make sure it’s because God wants it, not because I don’t care.

Let me ask a question to you Adam, and to anyone else who cares to answer. I hope it doesn’t sound snarky, because it is sincere and I’m curious and interested in hearing how people answer it. If you are not concerned about the dying PC(USA) then why be a part of it? If we choose to be here, aren’t we affirming that God is at work here? And if we affirm God’s work being done here, shouldn’t we be concerned if that work should stop? I think we can be concerned about the survival of the denomination, without being inordinately concerned about it.

Posted by : Shawn in (Church, Emerging Church, PC (USA))

Discerning by Committee

Thanks to Bruce, I just came across this fascinating article describing a church that used a process of group spiritual discernment to make a tough decision rather than simpling using Robert’s Rules.  This is exactly what I’ve been trying to say in these posts.  The author describes the process by drawing on Quaker and Congregationalists traditions.  Here is how he describes the difference between a group making a decision and a group discerning a direction.

Perhaps the most distinctive characteristic of the Congregationalists was their belief that no individual—whether a bishop, priest, or lay leader—is fully equipped to discern and follow God’s will. The early Congregationalists believed that the workings of the Holy Spirit can be discerned in community by receptive hearts that are molded in prayer. They put into practice their understanding that the gathered community is the true vessel of the Spirit of Christ—a term that they used often. They met often and their meetings were seen as opportunities to encounter God in their midst. That is, they were more like worship than legislative sessions. The community did not gather for decision making as much as for discernment. They listened to one another not out of some humanist notion that people of opposing views are worthy of respect but because one can never know who the Spirit will choose to speak through on any given occasion.

Certainly not every item before a church governing body should be handled with a discernment process, but I think it would be interesting if we shifted our focus and maybe even our terminology from “governing” to “discerning.”

Posted by : Shawn in (Church, Emerging Church, Sermon)

Sermon - Burning Man and Babylon

Jeremiah 29:1, 4-7

Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, to all the exiles whom I have sent into exile from Jerusalem to Babylon: 5 Build houses and live in them; plant gardens and eat what they produce. 6 Take wives and have sons and daughters; take wives for your sons, and give your daughters in marriage, that they may bear sons and daughters; multiply there, and do not decrease. 7 But seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the LORD on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare.


In Nevada, 90 miles north of Reno, there is a stretch of land called the Black Rock Desert. It is located in what used to be a large prehistoric lake. In the past this stretch of land has been mined for gold, used by jet powered cars to break land speed records, and in 2004 it was where the launch site for the first amateur built rocket sent into space. But none of those things are what the Black Rock Desert is most known for. Its claim to fame is that every year, during the last week of August, tens of thousands of people descend on it from all over the world to form Black Rock City- a temporary community that for one week becomes Nevada’s tenth largest city and home to the annual event known as Burning Man.

This is how the people behind Burning Man describe the event.


Our intention is to generate society that connects each individual to his or her creative powers, to participation in community, to the larger realm of civic life, and to the even greater world of nature that exists beyond society. We believe that the experience of Burning Man can produce positive spiritual change in the world.

It’s hard to describe Burning Man. Imagine Woodstock, an art festival, a campground, and a small rural town all rolled into one. It is dedicated to and organized around core principles, such as: radical inclusion, gifting, communal effort, and participation, and I could preach several sermons on what the church could learn from Burning Man. But this morning I want to highlight a similar theme that is shared by Burning Man and from our passage in Jeremiah: the need to adapt to your environemnt.

As I mentioned before, Burning Man takes place in a desert. As you can imagine, the desert isn’t the best place one would think of hosting 50,000 people for a week. So somehow each year, the organizers have to figure out how to create a small oasis of a city with minimal environmental impact, because another one of their core principles is to leave no trace behind of their presence, and to reduce their global impact on the environment. They do this in a number of ways, but it all starts from seeing the desert around them as something to adapt to rather than something to overcome. Instead of air-conditioned R.V.’s and portable generators, people are encouraged to use common sense, shade and a lot of water. Adapting to the desert is a community effort. There are a host of people who come to spend a week working to make this adaption possible. There is a Public Works crew that oversees water management, sanitation and hygeine facilities. There are the Lamp Lighters, a volunteer guild that walks Black Rock City every evening at dusk lighting the kerosene lamps that line the streets. A special group of people called Earth Guardians roam the city helping people to adapt and protect the land they occupy. At Burning Man, they don’t come to change and conquer their environment, rather they seek to change themselves and adapt themselves to the harsh desert environment.

In Jeremiah, the Jewish people also found themselves in a harsh environment. Israel had been conquered by the Babylonians, and many Israelites had been forced into exile to the city of Babylon. Jeremiah’s words from God are addressed to those exiled Jews who found themselves far from home, far from their promised land, and in a strange country with different customs and foreign gods. And God’s message to them is similar to the message of Burning Man – this is not a time to conquer, this is a time to adapt. God says,

5 Build houses and live in them; plant gardens and eat what they produce. 6 Take wives and have sons and daughters; take wives for your sons, and give your daughters in marriage, that they may bear sons and daughters; multiply there, and do not decrease. 7 But seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the LORD on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare.

This is not what the Jewish people wanted to hear. They were hoping for the good old days. The time when they kept separate from foreigners. When they had their own land, their own nation, and God led them into battle to conquer anyone who opposed them. But those days are gone, and now God tells them that it’s not time to conquer, but time to adapt. God tells them to look around and to notice that they aren’t in Israel any more. They aren’t in a Jewish nation, and they aren’t going to conquer Babylon and turn it into a Jewish nation. Those days are gone. Now they need to settle down, build houses, plant crops, get married and have children. God even goes further and tells them not just to adapt, but to pray for the city of Babylon, because their wellbeing is intertwined with the wellbeing of the city.

I’m sure it was a tough message to hear. The people of Israel were used to living in a Jewish nation. They resided in Israel, the promised land, with Jerusalem, the holy city, as its capital. Everyone’s daily life revolved around their Jewish identity. Their faith was supported by the people and institutions around them, because they were all a part of the nation’s Jewish identity. But now, in Babylon, they are a minority. They are a remnant of Jewish believers in a non-Jewish world. And they have to learn to adapt to that reality.

Guess what? That’s our reality, too. As Christians, we are living in a post-Christian world. There was a time when you could reference a story from the Bible and everyone would know what you were talking about. This isn’t the case any more. Not so long ago the question was “What church do you go to?” Now the question, if it’s asked at all, is “Do you go to church?” More often than not the answer is “no.” It’s nice to think that we live in a Christian nation. We’d like to believe that our nation still shares (if it ever did) a basic Christian ethic. But that’s not how it is.

Think of the thousands of people that drive by St. Philip each day. Statistically speaking a majority of them don’t go to church and many of their parents didn’t go to church either. It is no longer the case that anybody coming off the street to our church service would feel immediately at home here on Sunday morning. For many people, especially of younger generations, going to church is like going to a foreign land. But here’s the catch. They aren’t the foreigners. We are. Our society is not a Christian society. And like the Jewish exiles, we’d like to think we are still in Israel. But in this post-Christian age we are the minority, surrounded by people who don’t share our experiences and our God. We are the exiles living in Babylon. Christianity is in exile.

The sooner we realize this, the easier it will be for us to adjust to this new reality. It used to be the case that the church had authority in people’s lives, just because of the place it held in society. It was a given that people went to church and listened to what was proclaimed there. Churches didn’t have to adapt as much to changes in society and culture, because they were often the ones leading and changing society. But in our post-Christian society, people no longer automatically listen, or even notice, when the church speaks. We are exiles in Babylon, a minority in a strange land.

Given this new reality, we have several choices available to us. One of those choices is simply to enter into siege mentality. We can admit that the forces around us are overwhelming and we can cling to what we have here, exactly as it has been for years. The world may change, but we won’t! We are still alive and we’ll hold on as long as we can, regardless what happens in larger society. We can do that, but I pray to God that we won’t.

I’m hoping that the church will listen to God’s word in Jeremiah. God showed the Jewish exiles a new direction. God called the exiles to adapt and change. They weren’t told to transform Babylon into another Jerusalem. Instead God said to them, “Build houses, plant gardens, and have children! You are going to be there a long time. This is your home now, so you better get used to it, and you better figure out how to stay faithful to me in a strange land.” The message to the exiles was to change their attitude and learn how to live in the world around them. They were still called to be God’s people, they were still called to hold on to their Jewish identity, but not as a separate community withdrawing from society. They were called to hold fast to God, but also to adapt and interact with the people and the world around them.

And that is our call today – to learn how to adapt and interact with the people in the world around us. We still need to hold fast to our identity and beliefs as Christians, but we need to learn how to express, live and communicate those beliefs in a post-Christian world. As the church declines in numbers, how do we keep from declining in relevance? How do we speak to tens of millions of people, spanning several generations, that haven’t ever set foot in a church except maybe once for a wedding or funeral?

I’d like to give you the answer to these questions. I’d like to, but I can’t. These are huge questions with even bigger answers and it’s going to take all of us to begin to figure it out. But I think we have a starting place in our passage from today. God told the exiled Israelites to build houses, plant crops and to get married and have children. The Jewish people were called to build houses that would be suited for Babylon, not Israel. They were told to plant crops that would grow in Babylon, not Israel. And more shockingly, they were told to continue their families by marrying the Babylonians. God told the Israelites that in order to adapt they would need to use the practices and materials of Babylon, and they had to enter into relationship and share their lives with the the people outside their community. In short, they had to change how they did things, in small ways and big ways.

So if we are going to be relevant to a post-Christian world then it is going to require new relationships, new practices and new materials. God is calling us to change, in small ways and in big ways. It’s going to be a tricky balancing act. How do we keep our identity as a Christian community while adapting to a post-Christian world? How do we stay true to God’s word and will, while using the practices and materials of the world around us? I don’t know exactly, but somehow we have to. God has called us, the exiles in a post-Christian world, to seek the wellbeing of that world, because in its wellbeing we will find our own as well.

In the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. One God, Mother of us all. Amen.

Posted by : Shawn in (Emerging Church)

Burning Man

I’ve wanted to go to Burning Man ever since I first heard about it. Burning Man is an annual event in the Nevada desert where people come and form a large community (small city) formed around the principles of creation, creating, community and self-reliance. I’ll throw one quote at you from the Burning Man website but other than that I’m not going to try and describe it.

[The intention of Burning Man] “is to generate society that connects each individual to his or her creative powers, to participation in community, to the larger realm of civic life, and to the even greater world of nature that exists beyond society. We believe that the experience of Burning Man can produce positive spiritual change in the world.”

I recently heard someone say that the Ten Principles of Burning Man would be a good model for churches today. Other than the “radical self-reliance” I think I agree. So now I can go to the Playa and call it continuing education. If you want to come with me next year, let’s start making plans now. Am I joking? Maybe…

This is a satellite picture of this year’s Black Rock City (population 25,000), if you click on the picture you will go to a very high resolution version of it (it will take some extra time to download). Zoom in and check it out. I couldn’t see any naked people, but I’m sure they are there.

Posted by : Shawn in (Blogging, Emerging Church)

No Time for Blog, Doctor Jones.

I’ve got a lot to blog about and no time to do it.  I’m trying to catch up after being away for almost three weeks.  My evenings lately have been spent having cool, engaging and fun conversations with Karen Sloan (author of Flirting With Monasticism) and Neal Locke.  Both of these fine people are staying at our house while they attend the Presbyterian Global Fellowship conference here in Houston.  It’s cool because they are two of the folks behind Presbymergent.org, and so I’m keeping them up late in my further attempts to try and grok the whole emerging thing.

Hopefully, I’ll make the time to blog about some of this soon.

Posted by : Shawn in (Church, Emerging Church)

Open Source Wiki Worship 2.0

So I’m here at the Montreat Youth Conference, and while I was in worship something occurred to me.  The singing that takes place in many youth events is somewhat wiki-fied.   When a new song is introduced it doesn’t take long for the youth to:

  • Create actions for the words of the song
  • Introduce supplementary singing parts to the song
  •  Add clapping in particular parts of the song

This is often done by a couple of youth present as the song is being sung.  Then other youth see it and they do it to.  The new additions to the song are carried to other youth events and now the song has been edited by a mass of people.

I think the church could really learn from this collaborative worship experience.  The youth are eager to be creative and be part of the leadership process.  They want to move in worship and use their bodies rather than stand as still as a Buckingham Palace guard.

Posted by : Shawn in (Church, Emerging Church)

The Intentional Church

Everyone who has hope for the future of the church should listen to this talk by Diana Butler Bass. She does an incredible job talking about the relationship between Emerging Church and traditional mainline churches. For those unfamiliar with the term “Emerging Church” let me steal a little from Diana’s talk and say that it is about doing church intentionally. Not doing what we’ve always done just because we’ve always done it.  And not doing new things just because we are rebelling against what we’ve always done.

I’m not going to try to explain Emerging Church better than that because it’s not just a single concept to explain. It isn’t a set of beliefs, a program, or a plan (and it certainly isn’t just praise bands and Powerpoint). I’ve been reading a lot of emerging church books and blogs, and I think I’m just finally “getting it” or to put it more accurately and geeky - I think I’m begin to grok it.

Whatever Emerging Church is or isn’t, I think it is where the church needs to be, and Diana Butler Bass does an incredible job of saying so. I may edit the talk a little bit and burn it to CDs so that I can give it to as many people as I can. It’s that good, that relevant, and that important.

Her main metaphor she uses is an axis of how to describe churches. She begins with a one dimensional spectrum of conservative and liberal. To this she adds a second spectrum of established and intentional. Established is what 95% of mainline churches are today. Established churches do what they have been doing. It’s not that what they are doing is wrong, it’s just no longer intentional. Established churches don’t consider the broad range of options open to them in building community and doing worship, instead they focus on a narrow set of choices within their existing structures.

Intentional churches are willing to examine why they do things the way they do and ask if there is a better way of doing something. Does the sermon always have to be a ministerial 15 minute monologue? Is Sunday morning the best time for a service? Is having staff in charge of this program/ministry the best choice?

The third spectrum she gives is modern vs. postmodern. And now with these three spectrum we have a three dimensional space with which to think about churches. No longer can we simply talk about us and them, there are so many things that make churches different but also there is now much more common ground to be had. This is one of the things that is happening in the Emerging conversation. Conservative churches and liberal churches find that they are on a similar journey because they are intentional and postmodern in a denomination that is established and modern.

I’ve done a poor job or representing only a small portion of what makes this talk so good.  So stop what you are doing now and listen to this talk. I’m seriously considering listening to it a third time and taking notes. And I didn’t even take notes in seminary or college (which may explain a few things…).